VETERANS  FOR  PEACE
Chapter 134
Tacoma, WA
Veterans Working Together for Peace & Justice Through Non-violence. Wage Peace!


Arlington Northwest Memorial

Saturday, Sep 4 9am - 8pm
Sunday, Sep 5 9am - 5pm

Marine Park, Tacoma, WA
(Ruston Way)

A memorial to the American military dead from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Markers are placed in the grass with the names of each soldier, date of death as well as his or her hometown.

Price: free
Phone: (253) 590-8501
Age Suitability: All Ages
Tags: military, memorial

This is a memorial to the American military dead from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Markers are placed in the grass with the names of each soldier, date of death as well as his or her hometown.

Note: Tacoma VFP Monthly Meeting will take place at this location: 4:00 Sunday, 9/5


'What Happens if We Stay in Afghanistan': A Response to TIME Magazine by South Asia Solidarity Initiative

The August 9, 2010 issue of TIME magazine featured a striking cover photograph of an 18-year-old Afghan woman, Aisha, who was disfigured by the Taliban last year. The cover title read, "What happens if we leave Afghanistan." While Aisha's story and the stories of many other women like her may depict some part of the reality of women's lives under the Taliban, TIME's conclusion that continuing the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is necessary, is highly misleading and troubling.

Afghan women, like women around the world, have lived under very oppressive conditions for decades. Many women remain indoors, without education or health care, or economic security, have early marriages, and are unprotected from domestic violence. Today, after a decade of the U.S.-led occupation, the lives of Afghan women have become worse, not better: in addition to facing continued oppression under the Taliban and the equally oppressive Northern Alliance, they also live in a war zone.

TIME's statement echoes and resurrects the same justification for the war given during the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan: if U.S. forces withdraw from Afghanistan, any rights gained for Afghan women will be reversed by fundamentalist forces. However, this false logic grossly ignores the history of the U.S. imperialist relationship and presence in the region and its effect on women's rights. During the Soviet occupation in the 1980's, the U.S. armed the anti-Soviet Mujahideen forces, who were at one point led by Osama Bin Laden. In subsequent years the Taliban rose to power, with the Unitd States as its ally. In 2001, when the Bush administration sought to topple the Taliban regime, the United States armed and enlisted the help of the Northern Alliance, a coalition of warlords with its own track record of human rights abuses. Indeed, the United States has consistently chosen the side of fundamentalist allies at the expense of Afghan women, and has always sought its own gains in the region.

In its nine long years, the U.S.-led occupation of Afghanistan has done nothing to improve the conditions for people in Afghanistan, especially for women. As the classified documents recently leaked by WikiLeaks.org corroborate, the coalition forces have been killing hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents. According to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, the 2009 civilian death toll, close to 2,412 civilian deaths, was the highest of any year since the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001, and an increase of 24% from 2008. There has been a general increase in violence and civilian deaths because of occupation. A Human Rights Watch Press Alert in 2005, stated that up to 60% of law makers in the lower house of Afghanistan's newly elected parliament are directly or indirectly connected to human rights abuses. By 2009, the U.N. human development index ranked Afghanistan 181 out of 182 countries. The maternal mortality rate in Afghanistan reveals the highest ever documented. Over the past decade, the immensely corrupt, U.S.-backed Afghan regime led by Hamid Karzai has passed and maintained numerous misogynist laws, including the one that put Aisha in jail after she fled from her in-laws.

For the last decade, the occupying forces of the U.S. and its NATO allies have nourished warlords and supported a corrupt government, leading many to join the Taliban and increasing their influence across Afghanistan. Increased civilian deaths, a fundamentalist resurgence, and deadly bombing raids have led to a devastated country and a Taliban stronger than ever before. TIME's claim to "illuminate what is actually happening on the ground" falsely equates the last decade of occupation with progress. The occupation has not and will not bring democracy to Afghanistan, nor will it bring liberation to Afghan women. Instead, it has exacerbated deep-seated corruption in the government, the widespread abuse of women's rights and human rights by fundamentalists, including Karzai's allies, and stymied critical infrastructure development in the country. The question should not be "what happens if we leave Afghanistan," the question should be "what happened when we invaded Afghanistan" and "what happens if we stay in Afghanistan."

The Afghan people are capable of creating their own democratic future. Progressive groups and democratic parties in Afghanistan are fighting to reconstruct the peace and safety of their country, and more often than not, are forced underground for fear of their safety. Despite the repression from the U.S.-backed Karzai government, thousands of brave students and women have come out on to the streets of Kabul to protest the bombings and the continued war. It is from these forces that a larger progressive movement will emerge that could play a role in bringing real democracy to Afghanistan. If the United States continues the occupation, the space for progressive forces becomes increasingly limited.

We must know and remember, that liberation never comes from occupation. We must know and remember, that there will always be resistance to occupation. Occupations, no matter where they take place, from Iraq to Palestine to Turtle Island, are unjust. The American people must come out in support and solidarity with the resilient peoples of Afghanistan and elsewhere who are fighting for their own liberation, and must call for the end of all U.S. wars and occupations.

Signatories:

South Asia Solidarity Initiative
Iraq Veterans Against the War
Derrick O'Keefe co-writer of the autobiography Malalai Joya -- A Woman Among Warlords
Veterans For Peace
Courage to Resist
Anjali Kamat, Producer, Democracy Now!
Robert Jensen, University of Texas, Austin, TX

The South Asia Solidarity Initiative (SASI) is an organization based the United States that is in solidarity with progressive social movements and democratic politics in South Asia. We believe in the shared history and common struggles of South Asia and break from the confines of nation-states to carry forward an alternative vision for South Asia and its peoples.



Supreme Court Ruling on "Material Aid" Threatens Humanitarian Activities

(ACLU Press Release, June 21
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org)


NEW YORK – The United States Supreme Court today [June 21] upheld the broad application of a federal law that hinders the ability of human rights and humanitarian aid organizations to do their work by making it a crime to provide "material support" to designated "foreign terrorist organizations" (FTOs). The ruling thwarts the efforts of human rights organizations to persuade violent actors to renounce violence or cease their human rights abuses and jeopardizes the provision of aid and disaster relief in conflict zones controlled by designated groups, said the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, on behalf of the Carter Center and several other organizations known for their work to promote peace, further human rights and alleviate human suffering around the world.

Under the law, individuals face up to 15 years in prison for providing "material support" to FTOs, even if their work is intended to promote peaceful, lawful objectives. "Material support" is defined to include any "service," "training," "expert advice or assistance" or "personnel."

The following can be attributed to former President Jimmy Carter, founder of the Carter Center:

"We are disappointed that the Supreme Court has upheld a law that inhibits the work of human rights and conflict resolution groups. The 'material support law' – which is aimed at putting an end to terrorism – actually threatens our work and the work of many other peacemaking organizations that must interact directly with groups that have engaged in violence. The vague language of the law leaves us wondering if we will be prosecuted for our work to promote peace and freedom."

The following can be attributed to Melissa Goodman, staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project:

"Today's decision is disappointing and inconsistent with our First Amendment position. The government should not be in the business of criminalizing speech meant to promote peace and human rights."

Organizations that signed onto the ACLU's brief are the Carter Center, Christian Peacemaker Teams, Grassroots International, Human Rights Watch, International Crisis Group, the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution at George Mason University, the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at Notre Dame University, Operation USA and the Peace Appeal Foundation.

The ACLU's brief is available online at: www.aclu.org/national-security/amicus-brief-carter-center-and-other-humanitarian-groups-support-humanitarian-law-




Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator



The War is Making You Poor

The occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan are making us poor. Right now, America spends $159 billion per year on contingency operations for the occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. That is enough money to eliminate taxes for everyone who makes under $35,000 a year, while cutting the deficit.


Progressive Congressman Alan Grayson is once again leading the charge to put an end to this disastrous spending. Support the "War is Making You Poor" Act by signing the petition now at TheWarIsMakingYouPoor.com


VFP Natl Convention:  August


Obama drone "Kill list"
violates international law
and U.S. Constitution.



Join Campaign for
Department of Peace


VFP Tacoma supports a call for a U.S. Department of Peace. Visit Peace Alliance to help promote passage the Youth Promise Act. (Submitted by Ray Nakanaynay)



Amnesty International Media Statement
Friday, March 05, 2010

Amnesty International Outraged at President Obama’s Possible Flip Flop on Detainee Trials

Contact: AIUSA media office, 202-509-8194

(Washington, DC) Larry Cox, Amnesty International USA executive director, issued the following statement in response to news reports that the Obama administration is considering to try 9/11 detainees in military commissions after stating that the men would be tried in federal courts. A final decision is expected within the next two weeks:

  • "Hope and change will not rectify the damage today to the United States’ international reputation. Change requires more than hope; it requires action and resolve.


  • “Unfortunately when it comes to resolving Guantanamo, action and resolve seem currently absent in the White House.


  • “Military commissions were created to consider evidence too inadequate to submit to a valid court. The commissions do not conform to the due process standards established under international law and do not have legitimacy in the eyes of the global community.“The United States is just beginning to restore a measure of its credibility as a champion of human rights on the international stage. In one stroke, President Obama could reverse that hard-won progress.


  • “The hypocrisy shown by this possible decision has no bounds. The administration is scheduled to release the U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices on Tuesday, March 9, assessing human rights around the world. It is rather difficult to criticize the human rights records of other countries while the U.S. government still continues its absurd process of trying some detainees in kangaroo courts and holding others indefinitely.”








Coffee Strong - A Place for Peace


Friends Gathered at Coffee Strong

Coffee Strong is now the official meeting-place of our VFP Chapter. Located near Fort Lewis, Coffee Strong is one of only two pro-peace coffee houses believed to be operating near military bases nationwide.

Open Mon. - Sat., 7am to 7pm and Sun. 9am to 7pm
15109 Union Ave SW in Lakewood,
(next door to Subway)
Phone: (253) 581-1565

Coffee Strong provides soldiers, their families and recent vets a place away from the base where they can learn about resources available to them, meet with G.I. Rights Counselors, and access alternative information. The shop holds weekly movie nights, concerts and other events. For more information you can visit the GIvoice.org website.